TY - JOUR
T1 - SRGO hydrotreating over Ni-phosphide catalysts on granulated Al2O3
AU - Shamanaev, Ivan V.
AU - Suvorova, Anna O.
AU - Gerasimov, Evgeny Yu
AU - Pakharukova, Vera P.
AU - Panafidin, Maxim A.
AU - Yakovlev, Ilya V.
AU - Bukhtiyarova, Galina A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful to PAO Gazprom Neft (St. Petersburg) and AO Gazprom Neft Moscow Oil Refinery (Moscow) for providing SRGO and financial support of catalytic test. This work was supported by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation . The physicochemical studies are performed using the equipment of the Center of collective use “National Center of Catalyst Research”.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/10/15
Y1 - 2021/10/15
N2 - Ni-phosphides present a promising alternative to the conventional hydrotreatment NiMo sulfides. The hydrotreatment catalysts are supported on Al2O3 granules, and the similarly Al2O3 supported Ni-phosphide catalysts provide an interesting case for comparison. In this work the Ni-phosphide catalysts supported on Al2O3 granules were prepared using two procedures: 1) temperature-programmed reduction of “phosphite”-type precursor in hydrogen flow (TPR_I catalyst), 2) treatment of Ni nanoparticles with triphenylphosphine solution at elevated temperature (LP catalyst). The catalysts were characterized by ICP-AES chemical analysis, N2 physisorption, XRD, TEM, XPS, 27Al MAS NMR. The Ni2P particles were found in LP samples, while TPR method gives the mixture of Ni12P5 and Ni2P particles and amorphous AlPO4 on the alumina surface. The behavior of granulated Ni phosphide and conventional sulfided NiMo/Al2O3 catalysts was compared in hydroprocessing of straight-run gas oil (SRGO) at 340 °C, 4 MPa, V(H2)/V(feed) - 400 Nm3/m3, LHSV - 1,5 h−1. Hydrodesulfurization (HDS) and hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) activity of nickel phosphide catalysts were shown to be lower in comparison with NiMo/Al2O3. Hydrotreating of S-containing model compounds (DBT, 4-MDBT, 4,6-DMDBT) was carried out over TPR_I catalyst, and a negative effect of dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) and acridin additions on the HDS activity was observed.
AB - Ni-phosphides present a promising alternative to the conventional hydrotreatment NiMo sulfides. The hydrotreatment catalysts are supported on Al2O3 granules, and the similarly Al2O3 supported Ni-phosphide catalysts provide an interesting case for comparison. In this work the Ni-phosphide catalysts supported on Al2O3 granules were prepared using two procedures: 1) temperature-programmed reduction of “phosphite”-type precursor in hydrogen flow (TPR_I catalyst), 2) treatment of Ni nanoparticles with triphenylphosphine solution at elevated temperature (LP catalyst). The catalysts were characterized by ICP-AES chemical analysis, N2 physisorption, XRD, TEM, XPS, 27Al MAS NMR. The Ni2P particles were found in LP samples, while TPR method gives the mixture of Ni12P5 and Ni2P particles and amorphous AlPO4 on the alumina surface. The behavior of granulated Ni phosphide and conventional sulfided NiMo/Al2O3 catalysts was compared in hydroprocessing of straight-run gas oil (SRGO) at 340 °C, 4 MPa, V(H2)/V(feed) - 400 Nm3/m3, LHSV - 1,5 h−1. Hydrodesulfurization (HDS) and hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) activity of nickel phosphide catalysts were shown to be lower in comparison with NiMo/Al2O3. Hydrotreating of S-containing model compounds (DBT, 4-MDBT, 4,6-DMDBT) was carried out over TPR_I catalyst, and a negative effect of dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) and acridin additions on the HDS activity was observed.
KW - Hydrodenitrogenation
KW - Hydrodesulfurization
KW - Hydroprocessing
KW - Ni phosphide
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104324874&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cattod.2021.04.001
DO - 10.1016/j.cattod.2021.04.001
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85104324874
VL - 378
SP - 24
EP - 32
JO - Catalysis Today
JF - Catalysis Today
SN - 0920-5861
ER -