Efficiency and Equality: Twenty Years of Discussion on Spatial Development

L. V. Melnikova

doi:10.1134/S2079970522700137

Efficiency and Equality: Twenty Years of Discussion on Spatial Development

Переведенное название: Эффективность и равенство: двадцать лет дискуссии о пространственном развитии

L. V. Melnikova

Кафедра экономического управления ЭФ

Результат исследования: Научные публикации в периодических изданиях › статья › рецензирование

Аннотация

В статье на основе трех пластов литературы анализируются эволюция и взаимное влияние идей об эффективности и равенстве в пространственном развитии экономики, воплощение этих идей в конкурирующих концепциях региональной политики за период с 1990-х годов и до настоящего времени. Первый поток публикаций отражает дискуссию о роли пространства в эпоху глобализации и революционных изменений в области передачи информации. Полярные гипотезы - от «смерти пространства» до «тирании пространства» - стимулировали эмпирические оценки влияния расстояния на уровень экономических взаимодействий, которые не подтвердили тезис о «плоском мире», где равномерно распределена экономическая деятельность. В то же время в экспертном сообществе зрело недовольство результатами традиционной перераспределительной региональной политики, что породило второй поток литературы - дебаты между сторонниками «пространственно-нейтральной» и «локально-адресной» (или «место-ориентированной») политики. В фокусе первого подхода находятся городские агломерации как источники роста и мобильность как средство выравнивания, второй же нацелен на раскрытие недоиспользуемого потенциала каждого места. Дискуссия прояснила возможные последствия реализации этих подходов с точки зрения достижения эффективности национальной экономики и сокращения межрегионального неравенства. Признание ценности каждого места породило новое требование к локально-адресной политике - быть «локально-чувствительной», или локально-настраиваемой. Параллельно в русскоязычном сегменте литературы развивалась схожая дискуссия о направлениях пространственного развития российской экономики и принципах региональной политики. Предметом обсуждения стали вопросы, касающиеся территориальной концентрации социально-экономического роста в городах и способов сокращения межрегионального неравенства. Особенность дебатов состояла в том, что они происходили вокруг сменяющихся версий стратегий пространственного развития, основанных зачастую на противоположных принципах.

Переведенное название	Эффективность и равенство: двадцать лет дискуссии о пространственном развитии
Язык оригинала	английский
Страницы (с-по)	439-450
Число страниц	12
Журнал	Regional Research of Russia
Том	12
Номер выпуска	4
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522700137
Состояние	Опубликовано - 1 дек. 2022

Предметные области OECD FOS+WOS

5.02 ЭКОНОМИКА И БИЗНЕС
5.06 ПОЛИТОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ
5.07 СОЦИАЛЬНАЯ И ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ГЕОГРАФИЯ

Доступ к документу

10.1134/S2079970522700137

Другие файлы и ссылки

Fingerprint

Подробные сведения о темах исследования «Эффективность и равенство: двадцать лет дискуссии о пространственном развитии». Вместе они формируют уникальный семантический отпечаток (fingerprint).

Цитировать

@article{670373edf45141a6b9b1a6ce779b85cb,

title = "Efficiency and Equality: Twenty Years of Discussion on Spatial Development",

abstract = "Based on three strata of the literature, the evolution and mutual influence are analyzed of the ideas about efficiency and equality in spatial development, including the reflection of these ideas in competing regional-policy concepts from the 1990s to the present day. The first stream of publications captures the debate about the role of space in the era of globalization and revolutionary changes in information transfer. Polarized hypotheses, from the “death of space” to the “tyranny of space,” have stimulated empirical assessments on the impact of distance on the level of economic interactions. These assessments have not confirmed the thesis about a “flat world,” where economic activity is distributed evenly. At the same time, the expert community has become dissatisfied with the results of traditional redistributive regional policies, giving rise to a second stream of literature, i.e., the debate between the proponents of place-neutral and place-based policies. The former policy approach focuses on urban agglomerations as sources of growth while the latter seeks to unlock the underutilized potential of each place. The debate has clarified possible implications of these approaches in terms of achieving efficiency of national economies and reducing regional disparities. Recognizing the value of each place has led to a new requirement, i.e., that for the place-based policy to be place-sensitive. Simultaneously, a similar discussion about the focus areas of spatial development of the Russian economy and the principles of regional policy has been unfolding in the Russian-language segment. The major issues are the spatial concentration of growth in cities and the ways to reduce regional inequality. The main feature of the debate is its focus on the changing versions of spatial development strategies, which are often based on opposing principles.",

keywords = "city, discussion, distance, economic efficiency, mobility, regional inequality, regional policy, space",

author = "Melnikova, {L. V.}",

note = "Funding: This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 20-110-50400 “Efficiency and Equality: Twenty Years of Discussion on Spatial Development.”",

year = "2022",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1134/S2079970522700137",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "439--450",

journal = "Regional Research of Russia",

issn = "2079-9705",

publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficiency and Equality: Twenty Years of Discussion on Spatial Development

AU - Melnikova, L. V.

N1 - Funding: This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 20-110-50400 “Efficiency and Equality: Twenty Years of Discussion on Spatial Development.”

PY - 2022/12/1

Y1 - 2022/12/1

N2 - Based on three strata of the literature, the evolution and mutual influence are analyzed of the ideas about efficiency and equality in spatial development, including the reflection of these ideas in competing regional-policy concepts from the 1990s to the present day. The first stream of publications captures the debate about the role of space in the era of globalization and revolutionary changes in information transfer. Polarized hypotheses, from the “death of space” to the “tyranny of space,” have stimulated empirical assessments on the impact of distance on the level of economic interactions. These assessments have not confirmed the thesis about a “flat world,” where economic activity is distributed evenly. At the same time, the expert community has become dissatisfied with the results of traditional redistributive regional policies, giving rise to a second stream of literature, i.e., the debate between the proponents of place-neutral and place-based policies. The former policy approach focuses on urban agglomerations as sources of growth while the latter seeks to unlock the underutilized potential of each place. The debate has clarified possible implications of these approaches in terms of achieving efficiency of national economies and reducing regional disparities. Recognizing the value of each place has led to a new requirement, i.e., that for the place-based policy to be place-sensitive. Simultaneously, a similar discussion about the focus areas of spatial development of the Russian economy and the principles of regional policy has been unfolding in the Russian-language segment. The major issues are the spatial concentration of growth in cities and the ways to reduce regional inequality. The main feature of the debate is its focus on the changing versions of spatial development strategies, which are often based on opposing principles.

AB - Based on three strata of the literature, the evolution and mutual influence are analyzed of the ideas about efficiency and equality in spatial development, including the reflection of these ideas in competing regional-policy concepts from the 1990s to the present day. The first stream of publications captures the debate about the role of space in the era of globalization and revolutionary changes in information transfer. Polarized hypotheses, from the “death of space” to the “tyranny of space,” have stimulated empirical assessments on the impact of distance on the level of economic interactions. These assessments have not confirmed the thesis about a “flat world,” where economic activity is distributed evenly. At the same time, the expert community has become dissatisfied with the results of traditional redistributive regional policies, giving rise to a second stream of literature, i.e., the debate between the proponents of place-neutral and place-based policies. The former policy approach focuses on urban agglomerations as sources of growth while the latter seeks to unlock the underutilized potential of each place. The debate has clarified possible implications of these approaches in terms of achieving efficiency of national economies and reducing regional disparities. Recognizing the value of each place has led to a new requirement, i.e., that for the place-based policy to be place-sensitive. Simultaneously, a similar discussion about the focus areas of spatial development of the Russian economy and the principles of regional policy has been unfolding in the Russian-language segment. The major issues are the spatial concentration of growth in cities and the ways to reduce regional inequality. The main feature of the debate is its focus on the changing versions of spatial development strategies, which are often based on opposing principles.

KW - city

KW - discussion

KW - distance

KW - economic efficiency

KW - mobility

KW - regional inequality

KW - regional policy

KW - space

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85146444991&partnerID=40&md5=afa101ad63280f37bc0f1f2c18722631

UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/65ade012-ebbe-308f-8c72-481337b706ff/

U2 - 10.1134/S2079970522700137

DO - 10.1134/S2079970522700137

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 439

EP - 450

JO - Regional Research of Russia

JF - Regional Research of Russia

SN - 2079-9705

IS - 4

ER -