Common root of the theory of testimonial religious knowledge and some skeptical arguments

Результат исследования: Научные публикации в периодических изданияхстатья

Аннотация

The author discusses the mode of introduction of religious testimonial knowledge as a response to skepticism. It is argued that Professor Greco's Answer to The Argument from Peer Disagreement (Part Three; Application to the three skeptical arguments) requires accepting the thesis that has the same conceptual grounding as the skeptical statements about the impossibility to share any belief. Taking into account this common grounding, it is desirable to explain the statement "A major motivation for anti-skepticism about testimony is anti-skepticism in general" (Part Two). The theory of religious testimonial knowledge uses the statement, which can be grounded by accepting the Mental Holism. However, the Mental Holism is also a possible grounding for some skeptical theses. Thus, a philosopher who assumes religious testimonial knowledge takes not only an anti-skeptical position, but also can take a "proto-skeptical" position.

Язык оригиналаанглийский
Страницы (с-по)48-57
Число страниц10
ЖурналEpistemology and Philosophy of Science
Том53
Номер выпуска3
DOI
СостояниеОпубликовано - 2017

Fingerprint Подробные сведения о темах исследования «Common root of the theory of testimonial religious knowledge and some skeptical arguments». Вместе они формируют уникальный семантический отпечаток (fingerprint).

  • Цитировать