Abstract

Experimentally compared for the first time is the sensitivity of two magnetometer types implemented on a common base of rubidium atomic clock with coherent population trapping (CPT). The first magnetometer used a magneto-sensitive optically excited CPT resonance, the other measured field strength through the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) excited with alternating magnetic field. We show advantages and limitations of these promising quantum sensing technologies. Sensitivity of both types was measured under resonance excitation on the D1 line of 87Rb. We demonstrate that the Crossed D sign¡Crossed D sign Crossed D sign¢ magnetometer sensitivity may exceed that of the EPR device by two orders of magnitude.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNovel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIII
EditorsCornelius F. Hahlweg, Joseph R. Mulley
PublisherSPIE
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9781510637726
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Aug 2020
EventNovel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIII 2020 - Virtual, Online, United States
Duration: 24 Aug 20204 Sep 2020

Publication series

NameProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Volume11483
ISSN (Print)0277-786X
ISSN (Electronic)1996-756X

Conference

ConferenceNovel Optical Systems, Methods, and Applications XXIII 2020
CountryUnited States
CityVirtual, Online
Period24.08.202004.09.2020

Keywords

  • Atomic clock
  • CPT resonance
  • Optic cell
  • Quadrature signal
  • Rubidium
  • ATOMIC CLOCK
  • optic cell
  • rubidium
  • quadrature signal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of quantum CPT and EPR magnetometers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this