Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Structure of Ethyl Butanoate and Methyl Pentanoate Flames

A. M. Dmitriev, K. N. Osipova, D. A. Knyazkov, I. E. Gerasimov, A. G. Shmakov, O. P. Korobeinichev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The structure of premixed ethyl butanoate/O2/Ar flames stabilized on a flat burner at atmospheric pressure was studied by molecular beam mass spectrometry. Mole fraction profiles of the reactants, stable products, and major intermediates and temperature profiles were obtained in flames of stoichiometric (φ = 1) and rich (φ = 1.5) combustible mixtures. Experimental data are analyzed and compared with previously obtained experimental and numerical data for methyl pentanoate flames. The structure of ethyl butanoate flames is simulated using a detailed literature chemical-kinetic mechanism for the oxidation of fatty acid esters. The experimental profiles are compared with the simulated ones, and the conversion pathways of ethyl butanoate are analyzed. Based on a comparative analysis of experimental and simulated data, the main shortcomings of the model presented in the literature are identified and possible ways are proposed to improve the model. The decomposition of ethyl butanoate and methyl pentanoate are discussed based on an analysis of their conversion pathways; similarities and characteristic differences between their oxidation processes due to the structural differences of the molecules of the fuels are outlined.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-135
Number of pages11
JournalCombustion, Explosion and Shock Waves
Volume54
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Keywords

  • biofuel
  • combustion mechanism
  • flame structure
  • molecular beam mass spectrometry
  • OXIDATION
  • ENGINES
  • JET-STIRRED REACTOR
  • DECOMPOSITION
  • COMBUSTION CHEMISTRY
  • PREMIXED FLAMES
  • PHOTOIONIZATION MASS-SPECTROMETRY
  • ESTERS
  • BIODIESEL
  • FUEL

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Structure of Ethyl Butanoate and Methyl Pentanoate Flames'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this