Abstract
A structure is automatic if its domain, functions, and relations are all regular languages. Using the fact that every automatic structure is decidable, in the literature many decision problems have been solved by giving an automatic presentation of a particular structure. Khoussainov and Nerode asked whether there is some way to tell whether a structure has, or does not have, an automatic presentation. We answer this question by showing that the set of Turing machines that represent automata-presentable structures is Σ 1 1-complete. We also use similar methods to show that there is no reasonable characterisation of the structures with a polynomial-time presentation in the sense of Nerode and Remmel.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1630-1669 |
Number of pages | 40 |
Journal | Journal of Symbolic Logic |
Volume | 84 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2019 |
Keywords
- 03D05
- 03D45
- 03D80
- 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification
- 68Q45
- Primary 03C57
- Secondary 03D20
- INDEX SETS
- FREE ABELIAN-GROUPS
- classification
- index sets
- automatic structures
- COMPLEXITY
OECD FOS+WOS
- 1.01.QL LOGIC